Sunday Express Comment - VHET
Very High Earners Tax (VHET)
Very high earners can contribute more to Britain and be happy doing it.
David Cordingley – Leader
United Kingdom Popular Democrats (UKpopdems)
Everyone knows Britain is a very wealthy country, the fourth or fifth wealthiest in the world. Despite all the efforts of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, hundreds of thousands of individual Britons are rich beyond the dreams of millions of ordinary people in this country, and still more billions of ordinary folk across the globe. On the other hand, who could argue that the inactivity of this same government has left hundreds of thousands of ordinary Britons suffering serious poverty and disadvantage?
Let’s get off on the right foot, wealth is good for Britain. Wealth is the paper oil that powers and drives the economy of this country. Wealth is not a finite resource like energy or water where someone who has more leaves less for others. No, wealth is organic and can grow through efficiency for everyone. One person’s wealth does not leave another poor, not in most first world countries anyway. If used properly, wealth generates benefit for others through jobs and services.
Wealth ultimately comes from earnings, from work or pensions, inheritance, the selling of assets and other sources. With today’s soaring property market, even those with moderate incomes could well be asset millionaires. But, unlike this government which thinks property assets equals real wealth that should be penalised heavily through Council Tax, most sensible people know that assets only count as wealth when they are sold. Before then assets of every nature actually cost money to maintain. So don’t worry, we’re only concerned with real income here, and very high income at that.
The opposite to wealth is poverty. In Britain, poverty can go far deeper than lack of financial resources. Some believe there’s also a poverty of spirit, love and care, leaving thousands of young and old trapped in disadvantaged circumstances. The recent UN report on child welfare painted the picture clearly when it placed Britain bottom of the league of twenty-one industrialised nations for children’s health, education and family relationships. On the positive side let’s applaud Britain as a country of great compassion where family members, volunteer workers and many vocationally dedicated professionals work hard every day to make life better for millions.
There should be no real poverty in a country as wealthy as Britain. You’d think the rich could directly help the poor and disadvantaged, wouldn’t you? Surely, they do already, don’t they? Everyone knows the wealthy pay far more tax than ordinary people. That’s true isn’t it? Well, no. Britain has a tax regime where, if you are wealthy enough, tax consultants can find plenty of loopholes and hide-aways where money can be salted in order to avoid paying tax. This is all legitimate and legal. After all, it is everyone’s duty to minimize their tax burden. It’s just that the rich have access to experts who can do that job for them. Obscene as it sounds, many really high earners don’t pay as much tax, pound for pound, as really low earners!
Very high earners can contribute more to Britain and be happy doing it. Enter Very High Earners Tax (VHET). This is a magic tax because VHET benefits Britain, the poor and disadvantaged even if people legally avoid paying it! In fact, VHET works better if no-one pays it at all! The less VHET paid the more Britain benefits! No, honestly, I’m not having you on. Let’s have a look at it. VHET is designed to capture all British earnings from whatever source. Where these total earnings are above the allotted threshold, then tax is payable at the VHET rate of 55%. Any tax paid is totally ring-fenced to benefit Britain’s poorest and most disadvantaged, so VHET payers can have pride in the knowledge that they are directly and personally helping those much less fortunate than themselves.
The threshold at which VHET is paid is a wonder of common-sense. We’re talking about very high earners here so the basic threshold is 10 times British total average earnings, about £250,000! What’s more, for employers, the threshold increases depending on the number of British workers employed and their average earnings. So the threshold’s 100 times average earnings for 100 employees and up to 10,000 times for 100,000 employed! Just 10 employees doubles the threshold from10 to 20 times earnings. Employees taken from the disabled or long term unemployed register count triple, so just four employees could count as ten and double the threshold. You can see immediately how everyone benefits from VHET thresholds because those who employ more and pay more can gain more.
There’s even more to VHET because liability can be reduced further through allowances. Any earnings above the VHET threshold can be mitigated totally by directly investing in Britain. This includes buying British made goods and services (or that part which is British), or investing in UK bonds and equities, or donating to approved charities that support the poor and disadvantaged, or investing in approved UK environmental measures. Once again, anyone can see how paying less VHET will increase the benefit to Britain and the British people as a whole.
Anyone reading between the lines can appreciate VHET does not set out to catch legitimate company bosses who, between them, already provide employment for millions. VHET is designed more to encourage the very wealthy who employ no-one, or spend their money abroad, to gain personally by giving back more to the country and people that provides their wealth.

